I'd be pissed!!!
I read your article, and you do make some great points. I've always been a big fan of cycling.
It's totally reasonable to think that not all doping is created equal, and that some people have won clean and others dirty. In America, there is the delusion that Lance Armstrong was "just like all the others, why pick on him" - in reality, he was a mediocre cyclist before he got cancer, and he comes back one testicle short, and all of a sudden he can't be beaten? That's an absurdity that can't be explained by "everyone cheats"
Greg Lemond is often forgotten here in the USA, but there is every reason to believe that he won clean while lots of others were doping, and that he is one of the greatest cyclists of all time, denied his place in the history books only by (quite literally) shooting himself in the foot.
Your article is prescient and stands the test of time.
Well done.